↓ Skip to main content

Does Market Integration Buffer Risk, Erode Traditional Sharing Practices and Increase Inequality? A Test among Bolivian Forager-Farmers

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Does Market Integration Buffer Risk, Erode Traditional Sharing Practices and Increase Inequality? A Test among Bolivian Forager-Farmers
Published in
Human Ecology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10745-015-9764-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Gurven, Adrian V. Jaeggi, Chris von Rueden, Paul L. Hooper, Hillard Kaplan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 21%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 34 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 8%
Environmental Science 9 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,139,802
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#145
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,296
of 265,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.