↓ Skip to main content

Stability of mercury concentration measurements in archived soil and peat samples

Overview of attention for article published in Chemosphere, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stability of mercury concentration measurements in archived soil and peat samples
Published in
Chemosphere, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomáš Navrátil, Douglas A Burns, Tereza Nováková, Jiří Kaňa, Jan Rohovec, Michal Roll, Vojtěch Ettler

Abstract

Archived soil samples can provide important information on the history of environmental contamination and by comparison with recently collected samples, temporal trends can be inferred. Little previous work has addressed whether mercury (Hg) concentrations in soil samples are stable with long-term storage under standard laboratory conditions. In this study, we have re-analyzed using cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy a set of archived soil samples that ranged from relatively pristine mountainous sites to a polluted site near a non-ferrous metal smelter with a wide range of Hg concentrations (6.7-6485 μg kg-1). Samples included organic and mineral soils and peats with a carbon content that ranged from 0.2 to 47.7%. Soil samples were stored in polyethylene bags or bottles and held in laboratory rooms where temperature was not kept to a constant value. Mercury concentrations in four subsets of samples were originally measured in 2000, 2005, 2006 and 2007, and re-analyzed in 2017, i.e. after 17, 12, 11 and 10 years of storage. Statistical analyses of either separated or lumped data yielded no significant differences between the original and current Hg concentrations. Based on these analyses, we show that archived soil and peat samples can be used to evaluate historical soil mercury contamination.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Other 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 19%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Chemistry 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 35%