| Title |
Historical range contraction, and not taxonomy, explains the contemporary genetic structure of the Australian tree Acacia dealbata Link
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tree Genetics & Genomes, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11295-018-1262-0 |
| Authors |
Heidi Hirsch, David M. Richardson, Fiona A. C. Impson, Catharina Kleinjan, Johannes J. Le Roux |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,217,637
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Tree Genetics & Genomes
#272
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,384
of 334,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tree Genetics & Genomes
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.