↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenesis of Enteropathy-Associated T Cell Lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Pathogenesis of Enteropathy-Associated T Cell Lymphoma
Published in
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11899-018-0459-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Udit Chander, Rebecca J. Leeman-Neill, Govind Bhagat

Abstract

To provide an update on the pathogenesis of enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma (EATL) and its relationship with refractory celiac disease (RCD), in light of current knowledge of immune, genetic, and environmental factors that promote neoplastic transformation of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs). EATL frequently evolves from RCD type II (RCD II) but can occur "de novo" in individuals with celiac disease. Recurrent activating mutations in members of the JAK/STAT pathway have been recently described in EATL and RCD II, which suggests deregulation of cytokine signaling to be an early event in lymphomagenesis. Intraepithelial T cells are presumed to be the cell of origin of EATL (and RCD II). Recent in vitro molecular and phenotypic analyses and in vivo murine studies, however, suggest an origin of RCD II from innate IELs (NK/T cell precursors), which could also be the cell of origin of RCD II-derived EATL. The immune microenvironment of the small intestinal mucosa in celiac disease fosters the development of EATL, often in a multistep pathway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,465,161
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports
#140
of 430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,949
of 328,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.