↓ Skip to main content

Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker for tumour differentiation, staging and long-term clinical outcomes in gallbladder cancer

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker for tumour differentiation, staging and long-term clinical outcomes in gallbladder cancer
Published in
European Radiology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5602-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji Hye Min, Tae Wook Kang, Dong Ik Cha, Seong Hyun Kim, Kyung Sook Shin, Jeong Eun Lee, Kee-Taek Jang, Soo Hyun Ahn

Abstract

To evaluate the correlation between tumour differentiation or stage of gallbladder cancer (GBC) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), as well as to assess whether ADC value can predict long-term disease-free survival (DFS) after surgery. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Between March 2008 and June 2016, 79 patients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with diffusion-weighted image and subsequent surgery for GBC were included in this study. Correlations between quantitative ADC values and tumour differentiation or stage based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) were assessed using Spearman's correlation analysis. Prognostic factors for DFS were identified with multivariate Cox regression analysis using imaging and clinical characteristics. All patients were classified as having well- (n = 18), moderately (n = 35) or poorly differentiated GBCs (n = 26). The ADC value of GBCs was significantly correlated with tumour differentiation and AJCC stage (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Sixty-nine patients were followed up for 2.0-92.4 months (median, 23.5 months). On multivariate analysis, the significant prognostic factor for DFS was not tumour differentiation or AJCC stage but a binary tumour ADC value (hazard ratio, 4.29; p = 0.009). DFS rates were significantly different according to the classification of tumour ADC value (cut-off value = 1.04 × 10-3 mm2/s; p = 0.004). The ADC value of GBCs was significantly correlated with tumour differentiation as well as AJCC stage. In addition, it predicted long-term outcomes after surgery in patients with GBC. • ADC values of GBC and tumour differentiation were negatively correlated. • Lower ADC values of GBC were significantly correlated with higher tumour stage. • Tumour ADC value could be useful for risk stratification of GBC patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,486,645
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,484
of 4,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,043
of 328,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#46
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.