| Title |
Leaf and canopy photosynthetic CO2 uptake of a stand of Echinochloa polystachya on the Central Amazon floodplain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, March 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00323149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. T. F. Piedade, S. P. Long, W. J. Junk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 30% |
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2011.
All research outputs
#5,482,659
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,099
of 4,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,700
of 22,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.