↓ Skip to main content

Piece rates and workplace injury: Does survey evidence support Adam Smith?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Population Economics, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Piece rates and workplace injury: Does survey evidence support Adam Smith?
Published in
Journal of Population Economics, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00148-011-0393-5
Authors

Keith A. Bender, Colin P. Green, John S. Heywood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 34%
Unspecified 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,014,997
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Population Economics
#347
of 761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,219
of 145,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Population Economics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.