↓ Skip to main content

Detecting the intellectual structure of library and information science based on formal concept analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Detecting the intellectual structure of library and information science based on formal concept analysis
Published in
Scientometrics, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11192-015-1629-z
Authors

Ping Liu, Qiong Wu, Xiangming Mu, Kaipeng Yu, Yiting Guo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Librarian 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 43%
Computer Science 10 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,770,433
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,223
of 2,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,070
of 263,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#27
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.