↓ Skip to main content

Stress Response Modulation Underlying the Psychobiology of Resilience

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Stress Response Modulation Underlying the Psychobiology of Resilience
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11920-018-0887-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynnette A. Averill, Christopher L. Averill, Benjamin Kelmendi, Chadi G. Abdallah, Steven M. Southwick

Abstract

This review focuses on the relationship between resilience and the ability to effectively modulate the stress response. Neurobiological and behavioral responses to stress are highly variable. Exposure to a similar stressor can lead to heterogeneous outcomes-manifesting psychopathology in one individual, but having minimal effect, or even enhancing resilience, in another. We highlight aspects of stress response modulation related to early life development and epigenetics, selected neurobiological and neurochemical systems, and a number of emotional, cognitive, psychosocial, and behavioral factors important in resilience. We also briefly discuss interventions with potential to build and promote resilience. Throughout this review, we include evidence from recent preclinical and clinical studies relevant to the psychobiology of resilient stress response modulation. Effective modulation of the stress response is an essential component of resilience and is dependent on a complex interplay of neurobiological and behavioral factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 31 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Neuroscience 15 12%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 47 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,045,512
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#252
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,058
of 344,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.