| Title |
Response to commentary on “Is NHST logically flawed”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-018-2818-3 |
| Authors |
Jesper W. Schneider |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 67% |
| Librarian | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,868,111
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,497
of 2,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,772
of 343,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#58
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.