Title |
Regional meridional cells governing the interannual variability of the Hadley circulation in boreal winter
|
---|---|
Published in |
Climate Dynamics, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00382-018-4263-7 |
Authors |
Yong Sun, Laurent Z. X. Li, Gilles Ramstein, Tianjun Zhou, Ning Tan, Masa Kageyama, Shaoyin Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 44% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 15% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,067,617
of 24,483,002 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#456
of 5,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,666
of 335,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#8
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,483,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.