↓ Skip to main content

Optimal Trajectory Generation and Design of an 8-DoF Compliant Biped Robot for Walk on Inclined Ground

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Optimal Trajectory Generation and Design of an 8-DoF Compliant Biped Robot for Walk on Inclined Ground
Published in
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10846-018-0882-9
Authors

Abhishek Sarkar, Ashish Dutta

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 44%
Unspecified 2 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,188,009
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
#278
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,992
of 331,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.