↓ Skip to main content

Valuation structure in incomplete information contests: experimental evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Valuation structure in incomplete information contests: experimental evidence
Published in
Public Choice, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11127-018-0568-7
Authors

Diego Aycinena, Rimvydas Baltaduonis, Lucas Rentschler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Professor 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 71%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,707,268
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#923
of 1,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,037
of 329,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.