| Title |
Evaluating author name disambiguation for digital libraries: a case of DBLP
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-018-2824-5 |
| Authors |
Jinseok Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Librarian | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 30 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 15% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 50 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,999,288
of 24,002,307 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#405
of 2,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,412
of 332,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#13
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,002,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.