You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk‐sensitive planning for conserving coral reefs under rapid climate change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12587 |
| Authors |
Hawthorne L. Beyer, Emma V. Kennedy, Maria Beger, Chaolun Allen Chen, Joshua E. Cinner, Emily S. Darling, C. Mark Eakin, Ruth D. Gates, Scott F. Heron, Nancy Knowlton, David O. Obura, Stephen R. Palumbi, Hugh P. Possingham, Marji Puotinen, Rebecca K. Runting, William J. Skirving, Mark Spalding, Kerrie A. Wilson, Sally Wood, John E. Veron, Ove Hoegh‐Guldberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 276 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 16% |
| Australia | 26 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 12 | 4% |
| Canada | 7 | 3% |
| France | 6 | 2% |
| Kenya | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 131 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 225 | 82% |
| Scientists | 41 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 432 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 16% |
| Researcher | 59 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 13% |
| Other | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 61 | 14% |
| Unknown | 97 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 138 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 47 | 11% |
| Unknown | 107 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 489. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#54,353
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#12
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,159
of 343,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.