You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The hidden cost of wildfires: Economic valuation of health effects of wildfire smoke exposure in Southern California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Forest Economics, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jfe.2011.05.002 |
| Authors |
Leslie A. Richardson, Patricia A. Champ, John B. Loomis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 19% |
| Researcher | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 56 | 22% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 25 | 10% |
| Engineering | 17 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 18% |
| Unknown | 77 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,655,394
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forest Economics
#8
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,266
of 250,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forest Economics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.