| Title |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of Bone Density and Cross-Sectional Geometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Calcified Tissue International, January 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002230050015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Hong, J. A. Hipp, R. V. Mulkern, D. Jaramillo, B. D. Snyder |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 32% |
| Engineering | 10 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,015,585
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#260
of 1,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,061
of 112,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.