↓ Skip to main content

SmartTracing: self-learning-based Neuron reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Informatics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
SmartTracing: self-learning-based Neuron reconstruction
Published in
Brain Informatics, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40708-015-0018-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanbo Chen, Hang Xiao, Tianming Liu, Hanchuan Peng

Abstract

In this work, we propose SmartTracing, an automatic tracing framework that does not require substantial human intervention. There are two major novelties in SmartTracing. First, given an input image, SmartTracing invokes a user-provided existing neuron tracing method to produce an initial neuron reconstruction, from which the likelihood of every neuron reconstruction unit is estimated. This likelihood serves as a confidence score to identify reliable regions in a neuron reconstruction. With this score, SmartTracing automatically identifies reliable portions of a neuron reconstruction generated by some existing neuron tracing algorithms, without human intervention. These reliable regions are used as training exemplars. Second, from the training exemplars the most characteristic wavelet features are automatically selected and used in a machine learning framework to predict all image areas that most probably contain neuron signal. Since the training samples and their most characterizing features are selected from each individual image, the whole process is automatically adaptive to different images. Notably, SmartTracing can improve the performance of an existing automatic tracing method. In our experiment, with SmartTracing we have successfully reconstructed complete neuron morphology of 120 Drosophila neurons. In the future, the performance of SmartTracing will be tested in the BigNeuron project (bigneuron.org). It may lead to more advanced tracing algorithms and increase the throughput of neuron morphology-related studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 31%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 24%
Engineering 12 19%
Neuroscience 8 13%
Physics and Astronomy 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,770,433
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Brain Informatics
#79
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,460
of 266,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Informatics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.