↓ Skip to main content

Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Processing, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies
Published in
Cognitive Processing, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10339-014-0635-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayako Saneyoshi, Chikashi Michimata

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Canada 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 62%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Neuroscience 2 15%
Mathematics 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,288,585
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Processing
#294
of 338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,212
of 250,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Processing
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.