↓ Skip to main content

Correlation of texture analysis of paraspinal musculature on MRI with different clinical endpoints: Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS)

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Correlation of texture analysis of paraspinal musculature on MRI with different clinical endpoints: Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS)
Published in
European Radiology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5552-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manoj Mannil, Jakob M. Burgstaller, Ulrike Held, Mazda Farshad, Roman Guggenberger

Abstract

The aim of this study was to apply texture analysis (TA) on paraspinal musculature in T2-weighted (T2w) magnetic resonance images (MRI) of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients and correlate the findings with clinical outcome measures. Ninety patients were prospectively enrolled in the multi-centric Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS). All patients received a T2w MRI, from which we selected axial images perpendicular to the intervertebral disc at level L3/4 for TA. Regions-of-interest (ROI) were drawn of the paraspinal musculature and 304 TA features/ ROI were calculated. As clinical outcome measurements, we analysed three commonly applied measures: Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), as well as the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). We used two machine learning-based classifiers: Decision table, and k-nearest neighbours (k-NN). We observed no meaningful correlation between TA in paraspinal musculature and the two clinical outcome measures SSM symptoms and SSM function, while a moderate correlation was observed regarding the outcome measures RMDQ (k-NN: r = 0.56) and NRS (Decision Table: r = 0.72). In conclusion, MR TA is a viable tool to quantify medical images and illustrate correlations of microarchitectural changes invisible to a human reader with potential clinical impact. • TA is feasible on paraspinal musculature using MRI. • TA on paraspinal musculature correlates with SSM and RMDQ. • TA may enable a statement regarding clinical impact of imaging findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,523,725
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#3,363
of 4,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,118
of 328,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#75
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.