| Title |
Entwicklung telemedizinischer Lösungen auf Basis der elektronischen FallAkte
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00103-015-2221-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W. Deiters, S. Houta |
| Abstract |
Efficient communication among doctors who cooperatively support their patients is a prerequisite for implementing effective intersectoral treatment processes. In order to achieve this, IT is becoming increasingly important. With IT systems doctors want to exchange information concerning a patient's case (e.g. doctors' letters, medication prescriptions, etc.). Furthermore, more and more IT-based applications that support the treatment process between patient and doctor (e.g. telemedicine solutions) are being developed. The development of the electronic case record (elektronische FallAkte) has yielded concepts and solutions for a structured case-based information exchange. Furthermore, it has led to infrastructure solutions that support service-based applications for telemedical applications. The "elektronische FallAkte" is an initiative of health institutions that have been organized into the association "Verein elektronische FallAkte". In this paper, concepts and realizations of the "elektronische FallAkte", as well as service-based applications on that infrastructure are described. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 18% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#932
of 1,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,058
of 277,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.