↓ Skip to main content

Mycobacterium tuberculosis toxin Rv2872 is an RNase involved in vancomycin stress response and biofilm development

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Mycobacterium tuberculosis toxin Rv2872 is an RNase involved in vancomycin stress response and biofilm development
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-9132-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoyu Wang, Xiaokang Zhao, Hao Wang, Xue Huang, Xiangke Duan, Yinzhong Gu, Nzungize Lambert, Ke Zhang, Zhenhao Kou, Jianping Xie

Abstract

Bacterial toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are emerging important regulators of multiple cellular physiological events and candidates for novel antibiotic targets. To explore the role of Mycobacterium tuberculosis function, unknown toxin gene Rv2872 was heterologously expressed in Mycobacterium smegmatis (MS_Rv2872). Upon induction, MS_Rv2872 phenotype differed significantly from the control, such as increased vancomycin resistance, retarded growth, cell wall, and biofilm structure. This phenotype change might result from the RNase activity of Rv2872 as purified Rv2872 toxin protein can cleave the products of several key genes involved in abovementioned phenotypes. In summary, toxin Rv2872 was firstly reported to be a endonuclease involved in antibiotic stress responses, cell wall structure, and biofilm development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,893,418
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5,398
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,917
of 332,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#70
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.