| Title |
Analyzing candidemia guideline adherence identifies opportunities for antifungal stewardship
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10096-018-3285-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sibylle C. Mellinghoff, Pia Hartmann, Florian B. Cornely, Laura Knauth, Felix Köhler, Philipp Köhler, Carolin Krause, Christine Kronenberg, Sarah-Leonie Kranz, Vidya Menon, Hannah Müller, Jan-Hendrik Naendrup, Stefan Pützfeld, Anna Ronge, Jule Rutz, Danila Seidel, Hilmar Wisplinghoff, Oliver A. Cornely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,782,020
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#974
of 3,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,149
of 344,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.