↓ Skip to main content

The cognitive, affective motivational and clinical longitudinal determinants of apathy in schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
The cognitive, affective motivational and clinical longitudinal determinants of apathy in schizophrenia
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00406-018-0907-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphane Raffard, Catherine Bortolon, Hanan Yazbek, Christophe Lançon, Michel Benoit, Joanna Norton, Delphine Capdevielle

Abstract

Apathy is a frequent and debilitating condition with few treatment options available in schizophrenia patients. Despite evidence of its multidimensional structure, most of past studies have explored apathy through a categorical approach. The main objective of this study was to identify the cognitive, emotional, motivational, and clinical factors at baseline that best predicted the three subtypes of apathy dimensions at follow-up. In a longitudinal study, 137 participants diagnosed with schizophrenia underwent different assessments including clinical, motivational, affective and cognitive measurements, at 1-month (referred to as baseline) and 12-month follow-ups. Data were analyzed using partial least squares variance-based structural equation modeling. Three latent variables representing the three previously described domains of apathy reaching consensus in the literature were extracted from the Lille Apathy Rating Scale. Results showed that in addition to baseline apathy, positive symptoms, anticipatory pleasure and sensibility to punishment at baseline predicted cognitive apathy at follow-up. Likewise, both baseline apathy and sensibility to punishment predicted emotional apathy at follow-up. Finally, baseline anhedonia and episodic memory were the main variables the predicted behavioral apathy at follow-up. This is the first study to show specific associations between apathy subtypes and clinical and cognitive motivational dysfunction in individual with schizophrenia, indicating possible distinct underlying mechanisms to these demotivational symptoms. Treatment for apathy should address both types of processes. Importantly, our results demonstrate the interest of multidimensional approaches in the understanding of apathy in schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#21,162,249
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#1,094
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,638
of 330,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.