↓ Skip to main content

Thyroid diseases and skin autoimmunity

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thyroid diseases and skin autoimmunity
Published in
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11154-018-9450-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enke Baldini, Teresa Odorisio, Chiara Tuccilli, Severino Persechino, Salvatore Sorrenti, Antonio Catania, Daniele Pironi, Giovanni Carbotta, Laura Giacomelli, Stefano Arcieri, Massimo Vergine, Massimo Monti, Salvatore Ulisse

Abstract

The skin is the largest organ of the body, at the boundary with the outside environment. Primarily, it provides a physical and chemical barrier against external insults, but it can act also as immune organ because it contains a whole host of immune-competent cells of both the innate and the adaptive immune systems, which cooperate in eliminating invading pathogens following tissue injury. On the other hand, improper skin immune responses lead to autoimmune skin diseases (AISD), such as pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, vitiligo, and alopecia. Although the interplay among genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors has been shown to play a major role in AISD etiology and progression, the molecular mechanisms underlying disease development are far from being fully elucidated. In this context, epidemiological studies aimed at defining the association of different AISD with other autoimmune pathologies revealed possible shared molecular mechanism(s) responsible for disease progression. In particular, over the last decades, a number of reports have highlighted a significant association between thyroid diseases (TD), mainly autoimmune ones (AITD), and AISD. Here, we will recapitulate the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and pathogenesis of the main AISD, and we will summarize the epidemiological evidence showing the associations with TD as well as possible molecular mechanism(s) underlying TD and AISD pathological manifestations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#21,415,544
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#458
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,237
of 332,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.