↓ Skip to main content

Smartphones, Sensors, and Machine Learning to Advance Real-Time Prediction and Interventions for Suicide Prevention: a Review of Current Progress and Next Steps

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
Title
Smartphones, Sensors, and Machine Learning to Advance Real-Time Prediction and Interventions for Suicide Prevention: a Review of Current Progress and Next Steps
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11920-018-0914-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Torous, Mark E. Larsen, Colin Depp, Theodore D. Cosco, Ian Barnett, Matthew K. Nock, Joe Firth

Abstract

As rates of suicide continue to rise, there is urgent need for innovative approaches to better understand, predict, and care for those at high risk of suicide. Numerous mobile and sensor technology solutions have already been proposed, are in development, or are already available today. This review seeks to assess their clinical evidence and help the reader understand the current state of the field. Advances in smartphone sensing, machine learning methods, and mobile apps directed towards reducing suicide offer promising evidence; however, most of these innovative approaches are still nascent. Further replication and validation of preliminary results is needed. Whereas numerous promising mobile and sensor technology based solutions for real time understanding, predicting, and caring for those at highest risk of suicide are being studied today, their clinical utility remains largely unproven. However, given both the rapid pace and vast scale of current research efforts, we expect clinicians will soon see useful and impactful digital tools for this space within the next 2 to 5 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 312 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Researcher 38 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Student > Master 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 105 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 19%
Computer Science 30 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 8%
Engineering 21 7%
Social Sciences 15 5%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 125 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,613,585
of 23,925,854 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#185
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,132
of 332,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,925,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.