↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of Rectourethral Fistula Formation After Primary Whole-Gland Cryoablation for Prostate Cancer: Results from the Cryo On-Line Database Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Endourology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of Rectourethral Fistula Formation After Primary Whole-Gland Cryoablation for Prostate Cancer: Results from the Cryo On-Line Database Registry
Published in
Journal of Endourology, July 2018
DOI 10.1089/end.2018.0357
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alireza Aminsharifi, Thomas J. Polascik, Ariel Schulman, Kae Jack Tay, Ghalib Jibara, Christina Sze, Efrat Tsivian, Ahmed Elshafei, J. Stephen Jones

Abstract

To define the incidence and risk factors associated with rectourethral fistula (RUF) formation following primary whole-gland cryosurgery using a multicenter, centralized registry. The Cryo On-Line Data (COLD) registry was queried for men undergoing primary whole-gland cryotherapy between 1990 and 2014 who developed a RUF. Patient factors and disease parameters were correlated with RUF using Chi-square test and the t-test. Variables with P<0.25 were entered into a binary logistic regression with stepwise backward elimination to determine the factors associated with RUF formation. A total of 4,102 men underwent primary whole-gland cryotherapy, in the COLD registry at the time of analysis. Postoperative RUF was documented in 50 out of 4102 cases (1.21%). Patients with RUF had similar demographic data, prostate volume, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level and clinical stage in comparison to those without fistula. On both univariate and multivariate analyses, postoperative urinary retention (OR: 6.30; 95% CI 3.43-11.58, P<0.001), preoperative Gleason score of ≥7 (OR: 1.92; 95% CI 1.08-3.43, P=0.027) and preoperative incontinence (OR: 2.95, 95% CI 1.12-7.76, P=0.028) were the most signifiant risk factors associated with RUF formation. Primary whole-gland cryotherapy for prostate cancer is associated with a historically low rate (1.21%) of postoperative RUF formation. The rate decreased further to 0.55% over the last several years, suggesting better patient selection and technical improvement. Postoperative urinary retention, Gleason score > 7 and preoperative urinary incontinence were the key demographic, clinical and pathological features associated with RUF formation in this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Engineering 2 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endourology
#1,466
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,611
of 340,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endourology
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.