↓ Skip to main content

Time-Dependent Molecular Responses Differ between Gastric Bypass and Dieting but Are Conserved Across Species

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
75 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time-Dependent Molecular Responses Differ between Gastric Bypass and Dieting but Are Conserved Across Species
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danny Ben-Zvi, Luca Meoli, Wasif M. Abidi, Eirini Nestoridi, Courtney Panciotti, Erick Castillo, Palmenia Pizarro, Eleanor Shirley, William F. Gourash, Christopher C. Thompson, Rodrigo Munoz, Clary B. Clish, Ron C. Anafi, Anita P. Courcoulas, Nicholas Stylopoulos

Abstract

The effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) against obesity and its comorbidities has generated excitement about developing new, less invasive treatments that use the same molecular mechanisms. Although controversial, RYGB-induced improvement of metabolic function may not depend entirely upon weight loss. To elucidate the differences between RYGB and dieting, we studied several individual organ molecular responses and generated an integrative, interorgan view of organismal physiology. We also compared murine and human molecular signatures. We show that, although dieting and RYGB can bring about the same degree of weight loss, post-RYGB physiology is very different. RYGB induces distinct, organ-specific adaptations in a temporal pattern that is characterized by energetically demanding processes, which may be coordinated by HIF1a activation and the systemic repression of growth hormone receptor signaling. Many of these responses are conserved in rodents and humans and may contribute to the remarkable ability of surgery to induce and sustain metabolic improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Master 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 43 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,048,683
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#988
of 3,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,558
of 342,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#37
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.