| Title |
Shorter sleep duration is associated with poorer glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients with untreated sleep-disordered breathing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sleep and Breathing, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11325-015-1243-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nantaporn Siwasaranond, Hataikarn Nimitphong, Sunee Saetung, Naricha Chirakalwasan, Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul, Sirimon Reutrakul |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of sleep duration on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients with untreated sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). Ninety type 2 diabetes patients participated in the study. SDB was diagnosed using an overnight in-home monitoring device (WatchPAT200). Sleep duration was recorded by wrist actigraphy for 7 days. Medical records were reviewed for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values. Seventy-one patients (78.8 %) were diagnosed with SDB [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5]. In patients with SDB, there was no significant relationship between AHI and glycemic control. In addition, oxygen desaturation index, minimum oxygen saturation, and time spent below oxygen saturation of 90 % were not significantly correlated with glycemic control. Sleep duration, however, was inversely correlated with HbA1c (r = -0.264, p 0.026). Multiple regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, insulin use, diabetes duration, and AHI revealed that sleep duration was significantly associated with HbA1c (p = 0.005). Each hour reduction in sleep duration was associated with a 4.8 % increase in HbA1c of its original value (95 % CI 1.5-8.0). In type 2 diabetes patients with untreated SDB, shorter sleep duration was independently associated with poorer glycemic control. Sleep duration optimization may lead to improved glycemic control in this population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,173,668
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#564
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,118
of 266,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.