| Title |
Intellectual foundations of public choice, the forest from the trees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Choice, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11127-018-0545-1 |
| Authors |
Roger D. Congleton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,299,459
of 24,831,063 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#596
of 1,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,593
of 331,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,831,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.