| Title |
Evolution and Classification of Cannabis sativa (Marijuana, Hemp) in Relation to Human Utilization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Botanical Review, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12229-015-9157-3 |
| Authors |
Ernest Small |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 654 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 651 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 106 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 106 | 16% |
| Researcher | 80 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 69 | 11% |
| Unknown | 214 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 176 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 63 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 31 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 25 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 3% |
| Other | 91 | 14% |
| Unknown | 246 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,103,545
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#4
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,214
of 279,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them