↓ Skip to main content

Identifying and engineering a critical amino acid residue to enhance the catalytic efficiency of Pseudomonas sp. methyl parathion hydrolase

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Identifying and engineering a critical amino acid residue to enhance the catalytic efficiency of Pseudomonas sp. methyl parathion hydrolase
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-9108-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingnan Li, Haiquan Yang, Fei Xu

Abstract

Methyl parathion hydrolase (MPH) that hydrolyzes a wide range of organophosphorus pesticides can be used to remediate land polluted by the pesticides. Here, the catalytic efficiency of methyl parathion hydrolase from Pseudomonas sp. (WBC-3) was enhanced by searching and engineering a critical site far away from the binding pocket. In the first round, a four-site mutant with a modest increased catalytic efficiency (3.2-fold kcat/Km value of the wild type) was obtained with random mutagenesis. By splitting and re-combining the four substitutions in the mutant, the critical site S277, was identified to show the most significant effects of improving binding affinity and catalytic efficiency. With further site-saturation mutagenesis focused on the residue S277, another two substitutions were discovered to have even more significant decrease in Km (40.2 and 47.6 μM) and increased in kcat/Km values (9.5- and 10.3-fold of the wild type) compared to the original four-site mutant (3.0- and 3.2-fold). In the three-dimensional structure, residue S277 is located at a hinge region of a loop, which could act as a "lid" at the substrate entering to the binding pocket. This suggests that substitutions of residue S277 could affect substrate binding via conformational change in substrate entrance region. This work provides a valuable protocol combining random mutagenesis, site-saturation mutagenesis, structural and bioinformatics analyses to obtain mutants with high catalytic efficiency from a screening library of a modest size (3200 strains).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Master 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Environmental Science 3 21%
Chemistry 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#21,608,038
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,994
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,115
of 332,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#114
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.