You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A quantitative framework for investigating risk of deadly collisions between marine wildlife and boats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12447 |
| Authors |
Julien Martin, Quentin Sabatier, Timothy A. Gowan, Christophe Giraud, Eliezer Gurarie, Charles Scott Calleson, Joel G. Ortega‐Ortiz, Charles J. Deutsch, Athena Rycyk, Stacie M. Koslovsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| South Africa | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,852,871
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#846
of 2,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,283
of 293,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.