You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cell Cycle Oscillators
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2957-3 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2956-6, 978-1-4939-2957-3
|
| Authors |
Amanda S. Coutts, Louise Weston |
| Editors |
Coutts, Amanda S., Weston, Louise |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Sweden | 2 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 77% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 77% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,555,558
of 24,619,747 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#812
of 13,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,372
of 403,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#137
of 1,462 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,619,747 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,462 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.