You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meta-analysis of shared genetic architecture across ten pediatric autoimmune diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nm.3933 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yun R Li, Jin Li, Sihai D Zhao, Jonathan P Bradfield, Frank D Mentch, S Melkorka Maggadottir, Cuiping Hou, Debra J Abrams, Diana Chang, Feng Gao, Yiran Guo, Zhi Wei, John J Connolly, Christopher J Cardinale, Marina Bakay, Joseph T Glessner, Dong Li, Charlly Kao, Kelly A Thomas, Haijun Qiu, Rosetta M Chiavacci, Cecilia E Kim, Fengxiang Wang, James Snyder, Marylyn D Richie, Berit Flatø, Øystein Førre, Lee A Denson, Susan D Thompson, Mara L Becker, Stephen L Guthery, Anna Latiano, Elena Perez, Elena Resnick, Richard K Russell, David C Wilson, Mark S Silverberg, Vito Annese, Benedicte A Lie, Marilynn Punaro, Marla C Dubinsky, Dimitri S Monos, Caterina Strisciuglio, Annamaria Staiano, Erasmo Miele, Subra Kugathasan, Justine A Ellis, Jane E Munro, Kathleen E Sullivan, Carol A Wise, Helen Chapel, Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles, Struan F A Grant, Jordan S Orange, Patrick M A Sleiman, Edward M Behrens, Anne M Griffiths, Jack Satsangi, Terri H Finkel, Alon Keinan, Eline T Luning Prak, Constantin Polychronakos, Robert N Baldassano, Hongzhe Li, Brendan J Keating, Hakon Hakonarson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 8% |
| Spain | 6 | 6% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 52% |
| Scientists | 37 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 299 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 71 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 9% |
| Professor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 56 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Unknown | 56 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#332,863
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,228
of 9,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,980
of 281,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#8
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.