| Title |
The patient–doctor relationship: a synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients' perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp09x420248 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Ridd, Alison Shaw, Glyn Lewis, Chris Salisbury |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 392 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 13% |
| Researcher | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 66 | 16% |
| Unknown | 95 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 10% |
| Psychology | 30 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 64 | 16% |
| Unknown | 102 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,629,376
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,482
of 4,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,177
of 94,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.