| Title |
A study on Koza’s performance measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10710-014-9238-9 |
| Authors |
David F. Barrero, Bonifacio Castaño, María D. R-Moreno, David Camacho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 25% |
| Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 50% |
| Engineering | 3 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,344,095
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
#91
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,181
of 356,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.