↓ Skip to main content

Preclinical Rheumatoid Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Current Rheumatology Reports, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Preclinical Rheumatoid Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention
Published in
Current Rheumatology Reports, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11926-018-0754-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin D. Deane

Abstract

This review is to provide an update on the current understanding of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) development related to disease development prior to the onset clinically apparent synovitis and opportunities for disease prevention. A growing number of studies have demonstrated that serum elevations of autoantibodies rheumatoid factor and antibodies to citrullinated protein/peptide antigens (ACPA) are highly predictive of future development of IA/RA. This has underpinned the development of several prevention trials in RA. The full results from most of these prevention trials are pending, but ultimately, they should further inform several critical issues in RA prevention including identification and enrollment of individuals at high risk of imminent RA, the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of prevention, and potentially the identification of new targets for prevention. Results from studies in RA prevention as well as other ongoing natural history studies of RA will help to change the paradigm of how RA is managed, potentially adding prevention to the possibilities for management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,864,400
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Current Rheumatology Reports
#101
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,198
of 329,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Rheumatology Reports
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.