↓ Skip to main content

TDP-43 as a potential biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
TDP-43 as a potential biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Neurology, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12883-018-1091-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek Majumder, Jenna M. Gregory, Marcelo A. Barria, Alison Green, Suvankar Pal

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) are incurable, progressive and fatal neurodegenerative diseases with patients variably affected clinically by motor, behavior, and cognitive deficits. The accumulation of an RNA-binding protein, TDP-43, is the most significant pathological finding in approximately 95% of ALS cases and 50% of FTD cases, and discovery of this common pathological signature, together with an increasing understanding of the shared genetic basis of these disorders, has led to FTD and ALS being considered as part of a single disease continuum. Given the widespread aggregation and accumulation of TDP-43 in FTD-ALS spectrum disorder, TDP-43 may have potential as a biomarker in these diseases. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic utility of TDP-43 detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with FTD-ALS spectrum disorder. From seven studies, our results demonstrate that patients with ALS have a statistically significantly higher level of TDP-43 in CSF (effect size 0.64, 95% CI: 0.1-1.19, p = 0.02). These data suggest promise for the use of CSF TDP-43 as a biomarker for ALS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 6 4%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 51 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 25 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 59 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,306,187
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#82
of 2,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,694
of 330,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.