↓ Skip to main content

Évaluation de la communication thérapeutique pour améliorer l’accueil du patient au bloc opératoire: étude d’impact

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Évaluation de la communication thérapeutique pour améliorer l’accueil du patient au bloc opératoire: étude d’impact
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12630-018-1167-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuel Boselli, Nathalie Demaille, Géraldine Fuchs, Aïcha Manseur

Abstract

We wanted to assess the awareness of the nursing staff to therapeutic communications on improving the welcoming experience of patients in the operating room for outpatient surgery. This was a single centre prospective impact study performed in an outpatient surgery clinic. In a first phase, a questionnaire was administered by the anesthetist nurse upon arrival of the patient to assess the patient's comfort (NRSc) and satisfaction on a simple numeric scale, and calculate a negative communication score ('NC'). In the second phase, the awareness of the nursing staff on therapeutic communication was emphasized on listening, empathy and the use of positive wording, using educational videos. In the third phase, after the staff awareness-raising period, the questionnaire was repeated. Quantitative variables (primary outcome criterion made of the number of patients with a NC score ≥ 5, NRSc, satisfaction), and qualitative variables before and after the awareness raising phase to therapeutic communications were compared. A total of 234 patients were included (109 before and 125 after). Following the staff awareness session to therapeutic communication, the NC score ≥ 5 decreased significantly from 20% to 6% as well as the median NRSc [P25-P75] before (8 [8-9] vs 8 [7-8]) and after (8 [8-9] vs 8 [7-8]) anesthesia. The proportion of less anxious patients before the initiation of anesthesia was significantly higher after the therapeutic communication (32% vs 17%). Satisfaction significantly increased after the awareness phase (8 [7-10] vs (9 [8-10]). This preliminary study shows a mild improvement of the patients' comfort and satisfaction after therapeutic communication. A controlled randomized trial is needed to confirm those results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Unspecified 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 16 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Unspecified 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2021.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2,284
of 2,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,472
of 341,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#40
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.