| Title |
Severity assessment tools to guide ICU admission in community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-011-2261-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James D. Chalmers, Pallavi Mandal, Aran Singanayagam, Ahsan R. Akram, Gourab Choudhury, Philip M. Short, Adam T. Hill |
| Abstract |
The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine if severity assessment tools can be used to guide decisions regarding intensive care unit (ICU) admission of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 36 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,796,805
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,778
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,881
of 112,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.