↓ Skip to main content

Charge-switchable gold nanoparticles for enhanced enzymatic thermostability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Charge-switchable gold nanoparticles for enhanced enzymatic thermostability
Published in
Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, January 2015
DOI 10.1039/c5cp03021h
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiv Shankar, Sarvesh K. Soni, Hemant K. Daima, P. R. Selvakannan, Jayant M. Khire, Suresh K. Bhargava, Vipul Bansal

Abstract

This study illustrates a facile strategy for efficient immobilization of enzymes on a metal nanoparticle surface. The strategy proposed here enables the enzymatic activity to be retained while increasing the enzyme thermostability. It is demonstrated that the use of a zwitterionic amino acid tyrosine as a reducing and capping agent to synthesise gold nanoparticles allows efficient immobilization of phytase enzyme through charge-switchable electrostatic interactions. The detailed kinetic and thermodynamic studies reveal that the proposed enzyme immobilization strategy improves the overall quality of phytase by reducing the activation energy required for substrate hydrolysis and broadening the temperature window in which immobilized enzyme is able to operate. The outcomes of this study indicate that the underlying zwitterionic nature of 20 natural amino acids along with significant variability in their isoelectric points and hydropathy indices as well the ability of some of the amino acids to reduce metal ions is likely to offer significant opportunities for tailoring nano-bio interfaces in a rational manner for a range of biological applications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Materials Science 4 14%
Environmental Science 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#23,109,385
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
#12,271
of 17,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,877
of 361,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
#623
of 786 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 786 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.