↓ Skip to main content

Beyond the Down Low: Sexual Risk, Protection, and Disclosure Among At-Risk Black Men Who Have Sex with Both Men and Women (MSMW)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Beyond the Down Low: Sexual Risk, Protection, and Disclosure Among At-Risk Black Men Who Have Sex with Both Men and Women (MSMW)
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10508-008-9356-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Dodge, William L. Jeffries, Theo G. M. Sandfort

Abstract

Little information is available about sexual risk, protective, and disclosure practices among Black bisexually active men and how these may be amenable to intervention when necessary. In-depth interviews were conducted with 30 at-risk urban Black men who have sex with both men and women (MSMW). Participants reported protecting themselves and their partners through routine HIV testing, using condoms consistently, engaging in strategic positioning during sexual activity, and limiting the number of sexual partners. In addition, they described several reasons for not using protection, including not having condoms available, enjoying sexual activity more without condoms, and perceiving female partners to be "safer" than male partners. Disclosure of bisexuality was complex and reportedly difficult, in particular to female and gay-identified male partners. Future interventions must not only build protection and disclosure skills among MSMW, but also increase broader social awareness and acceptance of male bisexuality.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 77 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 13 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 35%
Psychology 15 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2011.
All research outputs
#4,568,682
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,563
of 3,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,434
of 82,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.