↓ Skip to main content

Effects of male dominance and courtship display on female choice in the ring-necked pheasant

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Effects of male dominance and courtship display on female choice in the ring-necked pheasant
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 1999
DOI 10.1007/s002650050558
Authors

Concha Mateos, Juan Carranza

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 55 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 28%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 10 16%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 75%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,459
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,698
of 35,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.