↓ Skip to main content

Performance benchmarking of four cell‐free protein expression systems

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology & Bioengineering, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance benchmarking of four cell‐free protein expression systems
Published in
Biotechnology & Bioengineering, October 2015
DOI 10.1002/bit.25814
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dejan Gagoski, Mark E. Polinkovsky, Sergey Mureev, Anne Kunert, Wayne Johnston, Yann Gambin, Kirill Alexandrov

Abstract

Over the last half a century, a range of cell-free protein expression systems based on pro- and eukaryotic organisms havehas been developed and have found a range of applications, from structural biology to directed protein evolution. While it is generally accepted that significant differences in performance among systems exist, there is a paucity of systematic experimental studies supporting this notion. Here, we took advantage of the Species- Independent Translation Initiation sequence to express and characterise 88 N-terminallyterminaly GFP- tagged human cytosolic proteins of different sizes in E. coli, wheat germWheat Germ (WGE),), HeLa and Leishmania-based (LTE) cell-free systems. Using a combination of single- molecule fluorescence spectroscopy, SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis we assessedas assess the expression yields, the fraction of full- length translation product and its aggregation propensity for each of these systems. Our results demonstrate that the E. coli system has the highest expression yields. However, we observe that high expression levels are accompanied by production of truncated species- particularly pronounced in the case of proteins larger than 70 kDa. Furthermore, proteins produced in the E. coli system display high aggregation propensity, with only 10% of tested proteins being produced in predominantly monodispersed form. The WGE system was the most productive among eukaryotic systemssystem tested. Finally, HeLa and LTE show comparable protein yields that are considerably lower than the ones achieved in the E. coli and WGE systems. The protein products produced in the HeLa system display slightly higher integrity, while the LTE- produced proteins have the lowest aggregation propensity among the systems analysed. The high quality of HeLa- and LTE-produced proteins enable their analysis without purification and make them suitable for analysis of multi-domain eukaryotic proteins. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 156 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 22%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 8 5%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 21%
Chemistry 12 7%
Engineering 7 4%
Chemical Engineering 5 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 23 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology & Bioengineering
#6,006
of 6,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,313
of 289,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology & Bioengineering
#70
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.