↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0613-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng Li, Wei-Hong Zhao, Qian Zhu, Shu-Jun Cao, Hua Ping, Xiaowei Xi, Guo-Juan Qin, Ming-Xing Yan, Duo Zhang, Jun Qiu, Jian Zhang

Abstract

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is the leading cause of maternal death during the first trimester of pregnancy. A better understanding of EP risk can help prevent its occurrence. We carried out a multi-center, large-sample, case-control study to evaluate the risk factors for EP in Shanghai, China. Women who were diagnosed with EP (n = 2411) and women with intrauterine pregnancies (n = 2416) were recruited from five hospitals in Shanghai, China. Information regarding the sociodemographic characteristics; reproductive, gynecological and surgical history; and previous and current use of contraceptives was collected from all participants. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and adjusted for potential confounding factors via multivariate logistic regression analysis. The study revealed that the risk of EP was associated with the traditional risk factors including previous EP (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.72, 95 % CI: 1.83-4.05), previous Chlamydia trachomatis infection (Adjusted OR = 3.18, 95 % CI: 2.64, 3.84), previous infertility (AOR = 2.18, 95 % CI: 1.66-2.88), previous adnexal surgery (AOR = 2.09, 95 % CI: 1.49-2.93), previous appendectomy (AOR = 1.64, 95 % CI: 1.13-2.37), and previous use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) (AOR = 1.72, 95 % CI: 1.39-2.13). Additionally, EP risk was increased following the failure of most contraceptives used in the current cycle including IUDs (AOR = 16.43, 95 % CI: 10.42-25.89), oral contraceptive pills (AOR = 3.02, 95 % CI: 1.16-7.86), levonorgestrel emergency contraception (AOR = 4.75, 95 % CI: 3.79-5.96), and female sterilization (AOR = 4 .73, 95 % CI: 1.04-21.52). Stratified analysis showed that in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was the main risk factor for EP in women with tubal infertility (AOR = 8.99, 95 % CI: 1.98-40.84), although IVF-ET showed no association with EP in women with non-tubal infertility (AOR = 2.52, 95 % CI: 0.14-44.67). In addition to the traditional risk factors, IVF-ET and current IUD use play dominant roles in the occurrence of EP. Attention should be given to women with tubal infertility who have undergone IVE-ET treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 267 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 16%
Student > Postgraduate 35 13%
Student > Master 28 10%
Researcher 20 7%
Other 15 6%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 88 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Neuroscience 4 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 99 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,138,421
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,982
of 4,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,879
of 267,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#36
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.