↓ Skip to main content

Safety of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for emergent reversal of factor Xa inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Safety of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for emergent reversal of factor Xa inhibitors
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40560-018-0303-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Tao, Elena N. Bukanova, Shamsuddin Akhtar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 19%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 25 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,856,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#366
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,424
of 344,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.