| Title |
Clinical exercise interventions in prostate cancer patients—a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-011-1271-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Freerk T. Baumann, Eva M. Zopf, Wilhelm Bloch |
| Abstract |
Urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, fatigue as well as fears and depression rank among the most common complaints in patients with prostate cancer, resulting in a reduced participation in daily life and social isolation. Consequently, the quality of life of prostate cancer patients is strongly affected in a negative way. Numerous studies focusing on physical exercise interventions in prostate cancers patients demonstrate positive physiological and psychological effects. Our objective was to evaluate the evidence of randomized controlled studies which examined exercise during medical treatment and in the aftercare of a prostate cancer disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 265 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 22% |
| Unknown | 58 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 25% |
| Sports and Recreations | 41 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 12% |
| Psychology | 14 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 73 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#909,025
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#75
of 4,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,993
of 135,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.