↓ Skip to main content

Female-to-Male Transsexual Individuals Demonstrate Different Own Body Identification

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Female-to-Male Transsexual Individuals Demonstrate Different Own Body Identification
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10508-015-0596-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamie D. Feusner, Jasenko Dervisic, Kyriaki Kosidou, Cecilia Dhejne, Susan Bookheimer, Ivanka Savic

Abstract

Transsexualism is characterized by feelings of incongruity between one's natal sex and one's gender identity. It is unclear whether transsexual individuals have a body image that is more congruent with their gender identity than their sex assigned at birth (natal sex) and, if so, whether there are contributions from perceptual dysfunctions. We compared 16 pre-hormone treatment female-to-male transsexual (FtM) individuals to 20 heterosexual female and 20 heterosexual male controls on a visual identification task. Participants viewed photographs of their own body that were morphed by different degrees to bodies of other females or males, and were instructed to rate "To what degree is this picture you?" We also tested global vs. local visual processing using the inverted faces task. FtM differed from both control groups in demonstrating higher self-identification ratings for bodies morphed to the sex congruent with their gender identity, and across a broad range of morph percentages. This difference was more pronounced for longer viewing durations. FtM showed reduced accuracy for upright faces compared with female controls for short duration stimuli, but no advantage for inverted faces. These results suggest different own body identification in FtM, consisting of a relatively diffuse identification with body images congruent with their gender identity. This is more likely accounted for by conscious, cognitive factors than perceptual differences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,148,274
of 25,365,817 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#586
of 3,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,908
of 273,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#11
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,365,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.