↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the essence of home: Older people's experience of home in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Occupational Therapy International, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the essence of home: Older people's experience of home in Australia
Published in
Occupational Therapy International, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/oti.312
Pubmed ID
Authors

Desleigh M. de Jonge, Andrew Jones, Rhonda Phillips, Magdalene Chung

Abstract

This qualitative inquiry explores the experiences of community-living older people in Australia living in their home environment. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 30 older people, aged 56-90, from three states in Australia. Purposive or maximum variation sampling was used to recruit people with diverse characteristics in terms of age, gender, living situation, dwelling type, tenure and location (urban/rural). Older people in this study stated that they were interested in the capacity of the house to support their many and varied occupations, particularly their ability to care for others. They also enjoyed the independence and autonomy that living in their own home afforded them. The location of the home in the community provided general convenience and offered opportunities for social connectedness. The home environment and the surrounding community also created an ambience and afforded people a particular lifestyle. The importance of the history of the home environment and the emotional connection older people have with the dwelling was another prevalent theme. Future research is recommended to investigate whether these views of the home are representative of other groups of older people and which aspects of the home they seek to retain when adapting their homes or relocating.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 5%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 31%
Social Sciences 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Design 3 5%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2011.
All research outputs
#21,885,607
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Occupational Therapy International
#276
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,997
of 189,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Occupational Therapy International
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.